You are here

Refusal to sign disciplinary memo is misconduct

Refusal to sign disciplinary memo is misconduct

Refusal to sign disciplinary memo is misconduct

An appellate court in California has found that an employee’s refusal to sign a disciplinary memorandum acknowledging receipt of the memo was grounds for termination for misconduct and disqualification for unemployment compensation. The former employee was a driver for a unionized nonprofit paratransit company. He was written up and disciplined in February, 2008 on the basis of a passenger’s complaint. When called to a meeting with the employer’s human resources manager and director of administrative services, he was told he was not entitled to have a union representative present and was asked to sign the memo above a line that said “Employee Signature as to Receipt.” He refused to sign...

lock The full text of this article is available to paid subscribers only. Login or subscribe to read more

 

Sign-up for our weekly Q&A; get a free report on electioneering